Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Padilla v. City of Angleton TX
as 21-20250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Angleton Texas
Padilla v. Quintero
as 21-40055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosendo Padilla, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Quintero
Michel Thomas v. Grundfos, CBS, et al
as 20-20505
Defendant / Appellee:
Grundfos, Chau Nguyen, Billy Baxter and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michel Thomas
Laurin Gamez-Padilla, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60682
Petitioner:
Deysi Leonora Padilla-Soler, Cinthya Yamileth Ramos-Castillo, Laurin Steffany Gamez-Padilla and others
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General
Nancy Sepulveda-Padilla v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60669
Petitioner:
Nancy Sepulveda-Padilla, also known as Nancy Padilla Sepulveda
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General
Sanjuanita Martinez Padilla v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60412
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
SANJUANITA MARTINEZ PADILLA
USA v. Abel Padilla
as 20-10436
Defendant / Appellant:
ABEL FERNANDO PADILLA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Roberto Padilla Espinoza
as 20-50273
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO PADILLA ESPINOZA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ismael Padilla v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 20-50159
Defendant / Appellee:
SENIOR WARDEN RONALD GIVENS, PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANT PAMELA WAGNER, LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL HERNANDEZ PADILLA
Ismael Padilla v. U.S. Dist Ct of No Dist of TX, et al
as 20-10123
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT OF NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION and U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL HERNANDEZ PADILLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
