Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust et al v. CitiMortgage Inc
as 3:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust , Richard S Groomer and Anita S Groomer
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust et al v. CitiMortgage Inc
as 4:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust and Marcelino Gonzalez Quilo
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust et al v. Citimortgage Inc
as 3:2010cv01118
Plaintiff:
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust , Cheryl Murphy and Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
Citimortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust et al v. CitiMortgage Inc
as 4:2010cv00390
Plaintiff:
Val-Com Acquisitions Trust , Ryan Robinson and Barbara J Robinson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blood v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Julie Blood
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lechner v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00302
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Lechner, Sr.
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc., NTFN, Inc., Colson Mortgage Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
