Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Ortiz v. U.S. Marshals, et al
as 7:2016cv00043
Defendant:
DEA and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Ortiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Drake v. Ramos
as 4:2015mc01959
Plaintiff:
E Drake
Defendant:
Rodolfo Ramos, Jr, Evangalina V Mote, Jason A. Zimmerman and others
Watson v. City of Allen et al
as 4:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
James H Watson
Defendant:
City of Allen, Texas , City of Amarillo, Texas, City of Arlington, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ogden v. Cobalt International Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Edward Ogden
Defendant:
Joseph H Bryant , James W Farnsworth , John P Wilkirson and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
IN RE: COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 4:2014cv03428
Plaintiff:
St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund and Fire and Police Retiree Health Care Fund, San Antonio
Defendant:
Joseph H Bryant , James W Farnsworth, John P Wilkirson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Manley v. Texas Southern University et al
as 4:2014mc02295
Petitioner:
Stephen Manley
Respondent:
Texas Southern University, Thurgood Marshall School of Law Admission Committee and Edward Renee
Davidson v. Key Energy Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02403
Plaintiff:
Ian W. Davidson
Defendant:
Key Energy Service, Inc. , Richard J Alario and J. Marshall Dodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Cady v. Key Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02368
Plaintiff:
Sean Cady
Defendant:
Key Energy Services, Inc. , Richard J Alario and J. Marshall Dodson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Schreve v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00208
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marshall T. Schreve
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
