Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Rivera v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00116
Plaintiff:
Christina Rivera
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Kerr et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00112
Plaintiff:
Terry Clint Kerr , Jerry L Kerr and Larry D Kerr
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Montes v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00113
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Montes
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Conta v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00114
Plaintiff:
Carol Conta
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Price et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00111
Plaintiff:
Janice Fite Price , Charles H Fite, III and Patricia E Dunn
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0754
Webb et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00109
Plaintiff:
Patricia Webb , Daniel Gene Webb and Laura Webb
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Frazier v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00110
Plaintiff:
Betty B Frazier
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Beitler et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Beitler , John Beitler and Anton Beitler
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Foreman Bradford et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
as 6:2017mc00106
Plaintiff:
Lois Foreman Bradford and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Aube v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00103
Plaintiff:
Beverly Aube
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
