Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant:
Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant:
OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant:
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stoner v. Calpine Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03317
Plaintiff:
William Stoner
Defendant:
Calpine Corporation, John (Thad) B. Hill III, Mary L. Brlas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Langston v. Calpine Corporation, et al.
as 4:2017cv03316
Defendant:
Calpine Corporation, Frank Cassidy, Thad Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight Langston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scarantino v. Calpine Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03256
Plaintiff:
Louis Scarantino
Defendant:
Calpine Corporation, Frank Cassidy, John B. Hill, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hickson v. Calpine Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03252
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Hickson
Defendant:
Calpine Corporation, Frank Cassidy, Thad Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowers v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 4:2013mc02354
Plaintiff:
Robert D Bowers
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, Marathon Oil Corporation, Enterprise Products Partners LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
