Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
The Mississippi Bar v. King
as 3:2020ad00007
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ralph P. King, II
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC v. McClure et al
as 3:2020cv00027
Petitioner:
Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC
Respondent:
Valerie McClure, Raymond King, Tracy Waaraniemi and others
Rush v. Mississippi Regional Housing Authority IV et al
as 1:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Zorri N. Rush
Defendant:
Mississippi Regional Housing Authority IV, Gwendolyn King and Brian Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
King v. Hood et al
as 3:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Patrick L. King
Defendant:
James Hood, Patrick Beasley, Lee McDivitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartzog et al v. Huffman et al
as 3:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
Kellie K. Hartzog , Bryan M. King , Robert C. King and others
Defendant:
Anthony L. Huffman, Huffman & Company, CPA, P.A., Justin A. Karas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Floyd v. The United States et al
as 3:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Floyd
Defendant:
The United States , United States Attorney General, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Noatex Corporation v. King Construction of Houston LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Noatex Corporation
Defendant:
King Construction of Houston LLC and Carl King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carbin (DO NOT FILE) v. King et al
as 2:2011mc00004
Petitioner:
Christopher Carbin (DO NOT FILE)
Respondent:
Ronald King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Conner v. Life Ins. Co. of GA, et al
as 5:2008cv00064
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of Georgia , Paul Norrell , Randy Britt and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
