Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hewlett-Packard Company v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:18-cv-764. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:18-cv-762.
as 4:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
Hewlett Packard Company
Defendant:
LG Electronics Inc , LG Electronics USA Inc , Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Hewlett-Packard Company v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03134
Plaintiff:
Hewlett Packard Company
Defendant:
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Compucom Systems Inc v. Hitachi Ltd et al
as 3:2011cv03130
Defendant:
Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi Displays Ltd, Hitachi America Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Compucom Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AEP Texas North Company et al v. Sweatt Industries, Inc. d/b/a Sentry Services et al
as 6:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
AEP Texas North Company , Southwerstern Electric Power Co , Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric and others
Defendant:
Sweatt Industries, Inc. d/b/a Sentry Services, Robert Lloyd Electric Co. d/b/a Lloyd Electric Co., Panhandle Line Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LG Electronics USA, Inc. v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv03492
Plaintiff:
LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Gulf Coast Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LG Electronics USA, Inc. v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01949
Plaintiff:
LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Innovative Logistics Services, Inc. and L&D Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LG Electronics USA, Inc. v. Cherokee Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01921
Plaintiff:
LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherokee Logistics, Inc. and D&D International Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
