Cases 71 - 80 of 138
Ragusa v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01928
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Ragusa
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv01907
Plaintiff:
Deanna Thomas
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowery et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv01908
Plaintiff:
Margie Lowery and John Lowery
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skelton v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 1:2012cv01889
Plaintiff:
Wilma Jane Skelton
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Womens Health & Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duet et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01822
Plaintiff:
Deniese Duet and Bob Duet
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Busby v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01811
Plaintiff:
Patricia G. Busby
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasch v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01813
Plaintiff:
Joan Marie Rasch
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camanga v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01810
Plaintiff:
Dolores Ann Camanga
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01819
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Arnold , David Arnold and Ethel Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brugier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01824
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Brugier and William Ray Brugier
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
