Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Landry et al v. ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
as 3:2015cv00378
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
Plaintiff:
Antoine J. Landry, Camille J. Landry, Charles G Landry, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
United States of America v. ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
as 3:2014cv00532
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Fairchild v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00319
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
Plaintiff:
Melodie Major Fairchild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Williams et al v. ExxonMobil Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00318
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Williams and Melva Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Vo et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01794
Plaintiff:
Anh Ngoc Vo , Nga Vo and Kurtis Tinh Vo
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , Chevron Pipeline Company , ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Vo et al v. Chevron USA Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01341
Plaintiff:
Anh Ngoc Vo , Nga Vo and Kurtis Tinh Vo
Defendant:
Chevron USA Inc , Chevron Pipeline Company , ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santini et al v. ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
as 2:2011cv03114
Plaintiff:
David J. Santini and Lindberg Santini, Jr.
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2007cv00476
Plaintiff:
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, ExxonMobil Pipeline Company and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
