Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Hill v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Elaine Hill
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. , John Does A-M and Jane Does N-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creel v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
Genevieve S. Creel
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefferson v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ava Jefferson
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gipson v. Food Giant
as 3:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Catherine Gipson
Defendant:
Food Giant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pearson v. Fowler et al
as 3:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tonya Pearson
Defendant:
Adam Fowler and Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Balfour v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
Easter Balfour
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. , Piggly Wiggly of Holly Springs, MS and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stanton v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Marcella McCann Stanton
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. and John Does I-IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodham v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tammy Woodham
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. and Pat Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Felicia Hays Harris
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lehaman et al v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Lehaman and James Lehaman
Defendant:
Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
