Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Washington v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00076
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Washington
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. , John Does 1-5 and XYZ Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. Variety Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Glenda F. Gaddis and Bennie R. Gaddis
Defendant:
Variety Stores, Inc. , Rose's Stores, Inc. , John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Autry Greer & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00780
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks
Defendant:
Autry Greer & Sons, Inc., John Does #1-5 and XYZ Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kidd et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jandis M. Johnson Kidd and Howard Lee Kidd
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, John Does 1-5 and XYZ Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Allen v. Fred's Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Anna L. Allen
Defendant:
Fred's Inc., Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc., Fred's Stores of Mississippi, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Roberts et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv01267
Plaintiff:
Michael Dell Roberts and Sandra S. Guidry
Defendant:
David Earl Johnson, DRC, Inc., Irene M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Huffmaster et al v. Foster et al
as 3:2007cv00676
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Huffmaster, John Doe 1-5 and Jane Doe 1-5
Defendant:
Charles Foster, Janelle Skinner-Weill, D. Andrew Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Byrd v. V & B International, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Juette Byrd, Juette Byrd and Juette Byrd
Defendant:
V & B International, Inc., John Does 1-5, XYZ Corporations 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
