Cases 51 - 60 of 172
Rivera v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03936
Plaintiff:
Mayela Campa Rivera
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Martinez v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03739
Plaintiff:
Adela Martinez
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robinson-Thompson v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03386
Plaintiff:
Jerry Robinson-Thompson
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST, INC. D/B/A SAM'S CLUB and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ray v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03276
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ray
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cantu v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03134
Plaintiff:
Amy Lynn Cantu
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Filed in Error
as 4:2022cv03133
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Delbosque v. Sams East Inc
as 3:2022cv01953
Plaintiff:
Maria Delbosque
Defendant:
Sams East Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flynn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Cheri Flynn
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Walmart Inc, Sam's East Inc doing business as Samsclub.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cervantes v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Erika Cervantes
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lujan v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Juan Lujan and T. Christopher Pinedo
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc., Sam's Club East, Inc. dba Sam's Club, Sam's Club West Inc. dba Sam's Club and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
