Cases 1 - 6 of 6
NGUYEN et al v. CDM SMITH INC.
as 4:2020cv01791
Plaintiff:
THUY VY NGUYEN, BEAU DEREK SANDERS and D.S. A MINOR
Defendant:
CDM SMITH INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USOR Site PRP Group v. A&M Contractors, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02441
Defendant:
League City, Texas, Lone Star Heat Treating Corp., J&R Wastewater Services Inc., d/b/a J&R Services and others
Cross Defendant:
Environmental Earth-Wise, Inc., Oil Mop LLC and Consolidated Waste, LLC d/b/a Liquid Waste Solutions
Cross Claimant:
Taylor Press Products Co., The Houston Housing Authority and Houston Engine & Balancing Service
Counter Claimant:
City of La Porte, Texas
Counter Defendant:
USOR Site PRP Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Amerex Brokers LLC v. D.S. Wolf Group International LLC
as 4:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Amerex Brokers LLC and David Barron GFI Group Inc.
Defendant:
D.S. Wolf Group International LLC and Tullett Prebon Americas Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federal Insurance Company v. CVS Revco D.S., Inc.
as 7:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
CVS Revco D.S., Inc., CVS Revco D.S., Inc. and CVS Revco D.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
D.S. as parent and next friend of her minor son, K.F v. Madisonville Consolidated Independent School District, et al.
as 1:2007cv00118
Defendant:
Madisonville Consolidated Independent School District, Keith Smith, Karen Richter and others
Plaintiff:
D.S. , as parent and next friend of her minor son, K.F. and D.S. , as parent and next friend of her minor son, K.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Klein et al v. O'Neal Inc et al
as 7:2003cv00102
Plaintiff:
Victoria Klein and Ashley Swadley
Defendant:
O'Neal Inc , CVS Pharmacy Inc , Carter-Glogau Laboratories and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
