Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Simpson et al v. American International Industries et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Defendant:
Brenntag Specialties LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, American International Industries (sued individually and as successor to Pinaud, Inc., Barbara Alice, Inc., Ed. Pinaud, Inc. d/b/a Ed. Pinaud, and Nestle-Le Mur Company), all for the Clubman line of products and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Simpson, James Taylor and Lonita Deanna Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
G & G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC v. Loftin et al
as 1:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Charles S. Loftin and Rusty Rail Tavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Oden et al
as 1:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Gail T. Oden and Benigno's Bar
Cause Of Action: Telecommunication Carrier, Commission and State Regulations
Miller et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
James R. Miller, Jr., Double B Farms, Fontenot & Fontenot and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience LP, Bayer Cropscience AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hale et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 2:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Hale, Stephen R. Hale, Stephen R. Hale and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Cropscience GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Certificate No. 20346 v. G&G, LLC
as 5:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Certificate No. 20346 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Certificate No. 20346
Defendant:
G&G, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
