Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 877
Heart to Heart Hospice of Greater Houston, LLC v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff: Heart to Heart Hospice of Greater Houston, LLC
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Heart to Heart Hospice of Greater Houston, LLC v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff: Heart to Heart Hospice of Greater Houston, LLC
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Heart to Heart Hospice of Houston, LLC v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: Heart to Heart Hospice of Houston, LLC
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Heart to Heart Hospice of Houston, LLC v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: Heart to Heart Hospice of Houston, LLC
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Space Exploration Technologies Corp v. Bell et al
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff: Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, SpaceX and Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Defendant: Carol Bell, in her official capacity as Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, James McHenry, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01823
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02192
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02120
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01598
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?