Cases 31 - 38 of 38
In re: In the Matter of the Se
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-4139
:
In re: IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF FAIR FINANCE, FAIR FINANCIAL, OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES AND TIMOTHY S. DURHAM
Movant - Appellant:
AKRON BEACON JOURNAL and INDIANAPOLIS BUSINESS JOURNAL
Movant:
INDIANAPOLIS STAR and WALL STREET JOURNAL
Movant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Smith
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-6086
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SMITH, aka Michael Walls
USA v. Felix Wall
as 10-1892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIX WALLS
USA, ex rel., et al v. Circle C Construction, LLC, et al
as 10-5754
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
USA, EX REL.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WALL
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
CIRCLE C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
PHASE TECH, LLC
USA, ex rel., et al v. Circle C Construction, LLC, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-5645
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA, EX REL. and BRIAN WALL
Defendant - Appellant:
CIRCLE C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
PHASE TECH, LLC
United States of America v. Dale Walls
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-4488
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DALE A. WALLS
USA v. Walls
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-2079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIX WALLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.