Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Timothy Young v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 12-1226
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4611
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4375
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4374
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Lamarr Fletcher v. Attorney General of the United, et al
as 10-6277
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMARR FLETCHER
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Darris Johnson-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 10-3910
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRIS JOHNSON-BEY
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
George Dawson v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 10-3856
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Marcus Jones v. Juan Castillo, et al
as 10-5376
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS DEANGELO JONES, aka Marcus DeAngelo Lee
Respondent - Appellee:
JUAN D. CASTILLO, Warden
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Dishawn Curry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1374
Petitioner - Appellant:
DISHAWN CURRY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARRELL WATTS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRIS ZYCH, Warden
Vetter Moore v. Eric Holder, et al
as 10-5067
Petitioner - Appellant:
VETTER MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, U. S. Attorney General and LAPPIN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
