Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Stanley Fryar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5843
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY FRYAR
Respondent - Appellee:
AARON SMITH, Warden and KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jyronna Parker v. KY Department of Correction
as 17-5398
Petitioner - Appellant:
JYRONNA PARKER
Respondent - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Tommy McGuire v. Julia Jones, et al
as 16-2661
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY MCGUIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
JULIA JONES, Secretary for the Florida Department of Corrections and STATE OF FLORIDA
Derrick Smith v. Shane Jackson, et al
as 16-2200
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
SHANE JACKSON, Warden, ANGELA GORDON and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ashondo Hill v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2076
Petitioner - Appellant:
ASHONDO KARICE HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DANIEL H. HEYNS, named as Daniel Heynes (Director)
Derrick Smith v. MDOC
as 16-1788
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Hearings Division
Robert Williams v. TN, et al
as 16-5426
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, Department of Corrections, CCA
Respondent:
MARK BANNSEN, et al., in their official and individual capacities
David Suire v. Kentucky Department of Correc, et al
as 14-5235
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID MYRON SUIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GRANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURTS
Timothy Brown v. MI Dept of Corr Parole Board
as 14-1243
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAROLE BOARD
Arthur Bell v. Carol Howes, et al
as 14-1169
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROL R. HOWES, Warden, Warden, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Governor, State of Michigan, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
