Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,316
Brian McElroy v. Zachary Ropos, et al
as 23-4037
Plaintiff: BRIAN KEITH MCELROY
Defendant: ZACHARY ROPOS, Patrol Sergeant, Shield #50, FRANK J. LEONBRUNO, Sheriff, Shield #145 and CITY OF PAINESVILLE, OH
Kevin Tolliver v. Jeff Noble, et al
as 23-4035
Plaintiff: KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Defendant: WARDEN JEFF NOBLE, STANLEY TAYLOR, INVESTIGATOR MATTHEW CHRISTLER and others
James Gandy, Jr. v. David LeMaster, et al
as 24-5060
Plaintiff: JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Defendant: DAVID LEMASTER, RANDA MOORMAN and TERRI BOYD
David Lettieri v. New York State Troopers
as 23-4033
Plaintiff: DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE TROOPERS
Antonio Bridges v. Raymond Barnes
as 24-1006
Plaintiff: ANTONIO VALLIN BRIDGES
Defendant: RAYMOND BARNES
Kaleb Basey v. USA, et al
as 23-6000
Plaintiff / Appellant: KALEB LEE BASEY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RALPH R. BEISTLINE, in his official capacity, RICHARD PAEZ, in his official capacity and others
Charles Moore v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 23-1926
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES MOORE
Defendant: CORIZON HEALTH, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: DAWN MALY, JANET CAMPBELL, LORI KOPKA and others
Haley Hargis v. Overton County, TN, et al
as 23-6081
Plaintiff / Appellee: HALEY HARGIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Mark Hargis
Defendant: OVERTON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellant: J. D. MASTERS
Darren Johnson v. Elizabeth Austin, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARREN DEON JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: ELIZABETH AUSTIN, BRIAN STRICKLIN, Registered Nurse, REGISTERED NURSE DON [UNKNOWN] and others
Haley Hargis v. Overton County, TN, et al
as 23-6080
Plaintiff / Appellee: HALEY HARGIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Mark Hargis
Defendant / Appellant: OVERTON COUNTY, TN, MELISSA BARNES, AMANDA POORE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?