Cases 91 - 100 of 785
Anthony VarnerIn re: Anthony Varner
as 22-3109
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY RAMONE VARNER
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Anthony Gaines, Jr. v. USA
as 21-6159
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CHARLES GAINES, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony Viola v. Cuyahoga Co Land Reutilization, et al
as 21-4139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY LAND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION, fka Cuyahoga County Land Bank, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Eric Grimes, et al v. IRS
as 21-4189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ANTHONY GRIMES and LOIS FORD-KIMBROUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Department of the Treasury
Tawanda Hall, et al v. Andrew Meisner, et al
as 21-1700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAWANDA HALL, CAROLYN MILLER, AMERICAN INTERNET GROUP, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW E. MEISNER, Oakland County, MI Treasurer, OAKLAND COUNTY, MI, SOUTHFIELD NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION INITIATIVE, LLC and others
Ohio Public Employees Ret v. FHLMC, et al
as 20-4082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
EUGENE M. MCQUADE, ANTHONY S. PISZEL, PATRICIA L. COOK and others
Anthony BrooksIn re: Anthony Brooks
as 22-5013
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY BROOKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Anthony Bonner
as 22-3006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY DARNELL BONNER
Yolanda Mendez-Rodriguez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-4181
Petitioner:
YOLANDA MARISOL MENDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, ANTHONY RICARDO MENDEZ-RODRIGUEZ and ROLANDO FABRICIO MENDEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Anthony Rockman
as 21-4188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY F. ROCKMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
