Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Sarah Lee v. Ohio Education Association, et al
as 19-3250
Defendant:
J. RICHARD LUMPE, in his official capacity as chair, vice-chair, and board member of the State Employment Relations Board, W. CRAIG ZIMPLER, in his official capacity as chair, vice-chair, and board member of the State Employment Relations Board, AVON LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, as representative of the class of all school districts in Ohio and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION and AVON LAKE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the Ohio Education Association
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH R. LEE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Umar Muhammad v. Melissa Jennings, et al
as 19-1190
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Identified on initiating document as Sherry Washington, MELISSA K. JENNINGS, Michigan Parole Board, MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Named as Parole Board et al - Members and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR MUHAMMAD
Warren K. Henness, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 19-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio, UNKNOWN PHARMACIES, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE and others
Other:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN K. HENNESS
Maureen Van Hoven v. Buckles & Buckles, P.L.C., et al
as 19-1078
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALDINE C. BUCKLES, BUCKLES & BUCKLES, P.L.C. and MICHAEL H.R. BUCKLES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAUREEN VAN HOVEN, for herself and class members
Concerned Pastors, et al v. Nick Khouri, et al
as 16-2628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, MELISSA MAYS, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NICK KHOURI, in his official capacity as Secretary of Treasury of the State of Michigan, FREDERICK HEADEN, in his official capacity as Chairperson of the Flint Receivership Advisory Board, MICHAEL A. TOWNSEND, in his official capacity as Member of the Flint Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Defendant:
NATASHA HENDERSON, in her official capacity as City Administrator and FLINT, CITY OF
Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven Wolnitzek, et al
as 16-5841
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. WINTER, JR.
Intervenor:
CAMERON A BLAU
Intervenor - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ALLISON JONES
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
STEVEN D. WOLNITZEK, official capacity as Chair, Judicial Conduct Commission, JANET L. STUMBO, official capacity as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission, EDDY COLEMAN, official capacity as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission and others
Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven Wolnitzek, et al
as 16-5836
Intervenor - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
CAMERON A BLAU and ALLISON JONES
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ROBERT A. WINTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
STEVEN D. WOLNITZEK, official capacity as Chair, Judicial Conduct Commission, JANET L. STUMBO, official capacity as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission, EDDY COLEMAN, official capacity as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission and others
Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven Wolnitzek, et al
as 16-5839
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ROBERT A. WINTER, JR.
Intervenor - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
CAMERON A BLAU
Intervenor:
ALLISON JONES
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
STEVEN D. WOLNITZEK, official capacity as Chair, Judicial Conduct Commission, JANET L. STUMBO, official capacity as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission, EDDY COLEMAN, official capacity as Member, Judicial Conduct Commission and others
Mark Crawford, et al v. Department of Treasury, et al
as 16-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK CRAWFORD, RAND PAUL, in his official capacity as member of the United States Senate, ROGER JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
