Cases 51 - 60 of 431
Richard Poe, II, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. POE, II, DICK POE MOTORS, LP and DICK POE DODGE, LP
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US, LLC
Dianna Blair, et al v. Charles Schievelhud, et al
as 22-5118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANNA CHRISTINE BLAIR and VIRGINIA ARLENE GOFORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES STEVEN SCHIEVELHUD and REBECCA STEE SCHIEVELHUD
Samantha Rajapakse v. Internet Escrow Services
as 22-6024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMANTHA DELANE RAJAPAKSE
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, dba Escrow.com
Mike Woronko, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 22-1849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE WORONKO, MICHAELKE WORONKO, RYAN CIRIGNANO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
East Hallows Limited Liability Company v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
as 22-5758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EAST HALLOWS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Todd Meldrum v. Dillard's, Inc., et al
as 22-3745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD E. MELDRUM
Defendant / Appellee:
DILLARD'S, INC. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Norman Quartermouse v. Bullitt County, KY Fiscal Court, et al
as 22-5819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN QUARTERMOUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
BULLITT COUNTY, KY FISCAL COURT and ANGELA GREENUP
BNA Associates LLC v. Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P.
as 22-5491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BNA ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P.
Nehemiah Rolle, Jr. v. AurGroup Financial Credit Union, et al
as 22-3513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEHEMIAH ROLLE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AURGROUP FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION and TIM BOELLNER, AurGroup Financial Credit Union CEO
C & W, LLP, et al v. Burgerim Group, Inc.
as 22-5306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C & W, LLP, WENDY ROSE and CHERYL ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
BURGERIM GROUP, INC. and BURGERIM GROUP USA INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
