Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Curtis Ferguson v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor in her official capacity, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director in her official capacity and BRIAN SHIPMAN, Chairperson of the Michigan Parole Board in his official capacity
Ashley Heath Baker v. Larry Chandler, et al
as 23-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY HEATH A. BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. CHANDLER, Warden, COOKIE CREWS, RHONDA D. MAY and others
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, et al v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., et al
as 22-5789
Plaintiff:
ULTIMATE CAKRA LIBERATION, Tribunal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya and CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, aka Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC., TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TROUSDALE TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Alger Ferguson v. Anna Valentine
as 22-5482
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALGER FERGUSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ANNA VALENTINE, Warden
Javon Hearn v. Jessie Ferguson
as 22-5429
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVON HEARN
Respondent / Appellee:
JESSIE FERGUSON
Reginald Ferguson v. USA
as 22-3033
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD FERGUSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Antrell Brown v. D. Supps, et al
as 17-1568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTRELL V. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SUPPS, MARSHAUN ROBINSON, M. VROMAN and others
Nathaniel Ferguson v. City of South Euclid, Ohio
as 17-3433
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, OH
Antrell Brown v. D. Supps, et al
as 17-1097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTRELL V. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SUPPS, M. ROBINSON, M. VROMAN and others
Kevin Ferguson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctio
as 16-3601
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
