Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Maurice Chapman, Sr. v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 13-3989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE CHAPMAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, Director, Ohio Department of Corrections, ERNIE MOORE, Warden, BILLY D. BAILEY, Librarian and others
La' Mon Akemon v. Ernie Moore
as 13-3673
Petitioner - Appellant:
LA' MON AKEMON
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
La' Mon Akemon v. Ernie Moore
as 13-3584
Petitioner - Appellant:
LA' MON AKEMON
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Gregory Clemmons v. Ernie Moore
as 13-3139
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY CLEMMONS
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Mujtabaa Mubashshir, et al v. Ernie Moore, et al
as 11-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUJTABAA L. MUBASHSHIR
Plaintiff:
GIBREAL JALLOW, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Director, Ohio Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, WARREN BURBURY, Chaplain Head, North Central Correctional Institution, JAQUELYN BURN, Chaplain, North Central Correctional Institution and others
Frank Brown, Jr. v. Decarlo Blackwell, et al
as 11-3133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK C. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DECARLO M. BLACKWELL, Inspector of Institutional Services at LOCI, DEB TIMMERMAN-COOPER, Warden, GARY CROFT, Chief Inspector of the Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. and others
Frank Brown, Jr. v. Gilbert Harwood, et al
as 11-3082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK C. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GILBERT A. HARWOOD, KIM A. CHAPMAN, JEFF NOBLE and others
Benjamin Robinson v. Department of Rehabilitation a, et al
as 10-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Larry Neeley v. Ernie Moore
as 10-3951
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY NEELEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Michael Ransom v. Ernie Moore
as 10-3388
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. RANSOM
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
