Cases 11 - 20 of 31
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
Marye Wahl v. GE, et al
as 13-6622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARYE WAHL
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GE HEALTHCARE, GE HEALTHCARE AS and others
GE v. S&S Sales Company, et al
as 13-3179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
S&S SALES COMPANY and ALVIN STERN
General Electric Capital Corpo v. Harvey Gainey, Sr.
as 12-2671
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
HARVEY N. GAINEY, SR., an individual
GE v. S&S Sales Company, et al
as 12-3984
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
S&S SALES COMPANY
Defendant:
ALVIN STERN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jarrett Hamilton v. GE
as 11-6521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARRETT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
In Re: Kazi Foods of Michigan, et al
as 11-107
Petitioner:
In re: KAZI FOODS OF FLORIDA, INCORPORATED, KAZI FOODS OF NEW YORK, INCORPORATED, KAZI FOODS OF ANNAPOLIS, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
KFC CORPORATION, KFC, GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION and others
Kim Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 11-6049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., EXXON-MOBILE INC., EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
