Cases 11 - 20 of 25
USA v. James Smith
as 19-1217
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marie Mayerova, et al v. Eastern Michigan University, et al
as 19-1177
Defendant / Appellant:
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF REGENTS OF EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, JAMES M. SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARIE MAYEROVA and ARIANA CHRETIEN
USA v. James Smith
as 17-2350
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
John Harris v. Mike Morris, et al
as 17-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ISAAC HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE MORRIS, MARY TREDER, DENNIS M. BEAGEN and others
James Smith v. Robert Farley, et al
as 15-5189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES PRESTON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT L. FARLEY, Warden, TIM FAZENBAKER, Unit Manager, Big Sandy, FEDERAL P.O. OFFICER, Beckley, WV and others
James Smith v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 14-6184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, KENYA BROWN, (F/N/U) COOPER, Unit Manager and others
USA v. James Smith
as 12-6623
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Chesapeake Exploration. L.L.C., et al v. Catlett Quality Plumbing & Hea, et al
as 12-4517
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION. L.L.C. and CHK UTICA, L.L.C.
Defendant:
CATLETT QUALITY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC L. HARTONG, MYRA A. HARTONG, AARON R.J. HARTONG and others
James Smith v. State of Tennessee Board of Pr
as 12-5703
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RAY SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and JIM LEACH, Officer
James Smith, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 11-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. SMITH and CYNTHIA BROWN-SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
