Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Phillip Bloodworth v. Mark Pouperd, et al
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BLOODWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER MARK POUPERD, JOHN DOE 1, 1st Shift Commander, CORRECTION OFFICER FORD and others
USA v. Timothy Bloodworth
as 21-2702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BLOODWORTH
Gary Houchens, et al v. Andy Beshear, et al
as 20-5644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA TIMBERLAKE, MILTON SEYMORE, GARY HOUCHENS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALVIS JOHNSON, LU YOUNG, ANDY BESHEAR, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
USA v. Quincy Bloodworth
as 19-1193
Defendant / Appellant:
QUINCY TREMAYNE BLOODWORTH, aka Quincy Tremayne Smith-Bloodworth
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald Bloodworth v. Debora Timmerman-Cooper
as 12-4541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLOODWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORA A. TIMMERMAN-COOPER, Warden, et al.
Ronald Bloodworth v. Debora Timmerman-Cooper, et al
as 12-4277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLOODWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORA A. TIMMERMAN-COOPER, Warden, et al.
Ronald Bloodworth v. Debora Timmerman-Cooper, et al
as 12-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLOODWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORA A. TIMMERMAN-COOPER, Warden, et al.
Ronald Bloodworth v. Keith Smith, et al
as 12-3186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLOODWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH SMITH, Warden
Ronald Bloodworth v. Keith Smith, et al
as 11-4215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLOODWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH SMITH, Individually and in his official capacity as Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution and K. J. FULLENKAMP, Individually and in his official capacity as Captain, Toledo Correctional Institution
Ronald Bloodworth v. Keith Smith, et al
as 11-3737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLOODWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH SMITH, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
