Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mayra Berrios Delcid, et al v. William Barr
as 20-3290
Petitioner:
MAYRA ELIZABETH BERRIOS DELCID and ANY ALEXANDRA MAIRENA BERRIOS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Alfredo Martinez
as 17-1114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO ANTONIO MARTINEZ, aka Victor Manuel Berrios
Jack Smith v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARBARA S. SAMPSON, Chairperson, TED HAMMON, Parole Board Member and others
Fidel Hutchins v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 13-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDEL HUTCHINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, DAVID KLINEHART, MARILYN MOORE and others
David Lytal, et al v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM LYTAL and PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson State of Michigan Parole Board, JAMES ATTERBERRY, Member, CHARLES L. BROWN, Member and others
Kent Shultz v. Miguel Berrios, et al
as 11-1594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT G. SHULTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MIGUEL BERRIOS, LAURIN THOMAS and JODI DEANGELO
Michael Dionne v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 11-1477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DIONNE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA S. SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY, MIGUAL BERRIOS and others
Scott Deming v. Ted Hammon, et al
as 10-1940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT J. DEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
TED HAMMON, Michigan Parole Board Member and MIGUAL BERRIOS, Michigan Parole Board Member
USA v. Charles Berrios
as 09-6425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIAM BERRIOS
Jameal Thomas v. John Rubitschun, et al
as 09-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMEAL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN S. RUBITSCHUN, Chairman, Michigan Parole Board, BARBARA S. SAMPSON, Successor Chairman Michigan Parole Board, JAMES B. QUINLAN, Member, Michigan Parole Board and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
