Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tiffany Savoie, et al v. Cty of East Lansing, MI, et al
as 21-2684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY LOUISE SAVOIE, an individual and NATALIE PAIGE LOUISE HOOPER, an individual, fka Natalie Page Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF EAST LANSING, MI, SERGEANT ADAM PARK, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the East Lansing Police Department, OFFICER MATTHEW SWAB, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the East Lansing Police Department and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Jane Doe #1, UNKNOWN PARTY #2, named as Jane Doe #2 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-10 inclusive
Denece Thomas v. Toms King (Ohio), LLC, et al
as 20-3977
Defendant / Appellee:
TOMS KING (OHIO II), LLC, DOES, 1-10, inclusive, TOMS KING SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENECE THOMAS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Tobin Segrist, et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 19-5153
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, FRED HOWELL, Individually, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York As Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2003-2 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY SEGRIST and TOBIN SEGRIST
Tobin Segrist, et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 17-6139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBIN SEGRIST and AMY SEGRIST
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York As Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2003-2, FULL SPECTRUM LENDING, FRED HOWELL, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
