Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mikequale Miller, et al v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc., et al
as 22-3290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEQUALE MILLER
Plaintiff:
DEMETRAIS MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
PEP BOYS-MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC., TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES BAJA MOTORSPORT, TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. and others
USA v. Manish Gupta
as 21-4140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MANISH RAJ GUPTA, aka Manny Gupta
Greg Adkisson, et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc
as 21-5801
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREG ADKISSON, DONNA ADKISSON, GABRIEL BILLINGSLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
In re: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc
as 21-504
Respondent:
DAN CODY, JULIE BLEDSOE, ROBERT TEDDER and others
Petitioner:
In re: JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
USA v. Manish Gupta
as 20-3763
Defendant / Appellant:
MANISH RAJ GUTPA, aka Manny Gupta
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Greg Adkisson, et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc
as 14-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREG ADKISSON, DONNA ADKISSON, LEONARD BLEDSOE and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN BERRY, GABRIEL BILLINGSLEY, J. R. REED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
USA v. Ghazi Manni
as 14-1863
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GHAZI MANNI
King Cole Foods, Inc., et al v. USA, et al
as 13-1759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KING COLE FOODS, INC. and SALAM SAM MANNI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-10, Federal Agent and others
USA v. Manny Rosario
as 12-1164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANNY ELVIS ROSARIO
Lawrence Crayton, Jr. v. USA
as 09-5845
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EDWARD CRAYTON, JR., aka Alex Winters, aka Manny Harris
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
