Cases 1 - 10 of 543
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5820
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5784
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5555
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Hensley v. USA
as 23-5287
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. HENSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Reed, et al v. USA
as 22-5493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. REED, Individually, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Constance M. Reed, deceased, and as surviving parent of Chloe E. Reed and Lillian D. Reed, deceased and JAMES L. ENGLAND, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael DeSpain v. Louisville Metropolitan Government, et al
as 21-6237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESPAIN and MICHAEL R. DESPAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, STEVE CONRAD, Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT KIT STEMILE and others
Michael Holland v. USA
as 21-5251
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. HOLLAND
Bob Anderson v. City of Fulton, KY, et al
as 21-5001
Defendant / Appellee:
LONNIE BELL, individually, JAMES R. BUCKINGHAM, II, individually, JOHN TILLEY, individually and others
Defendant:
CITY OF FULTON, KY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOB ANDERSON, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Christopher McClure, Deceased, and Next Friend of S.M., B.M., and C.M., Minor Daughters of Mr. McClure
William Thomas, Jr. v. Office of the Attorney General, et al
as 20-6436
Appellee:
MICHAEL B. WILLEY and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, TN
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
USA v. Michael Henry
as 20-6368
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. HENRY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
