Cases 1 - 10 of 612
USA v. Albert Greer, Sr.
as 24-1437
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALBERT GREER, SR.
David Reed v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLAN REED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Genesee County Sheriff and BRIAN D. MACMILLAN, Sr. Asst. Pros Atty/FOIA Coordinator
Brian White, Sr. v. Sushruth Shenava
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LAMOUNT WHITE, SR.
Defendant:
SUSHRUTH SHENAVA, Medical Doctor
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
USA v. Mark Stinson, Sr.
as 24-5448
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Carol Givens v. John Vavra, et al
as 24-3381
Plaintiff:
CAROL L. GIVENS
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN A. VAVRA, MAYOR ROBERT NEWHART, SR., BELMONT COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
USA v. Mark Stinson, Sr.
as 24-5435
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Isaiah Harris v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3294
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, in her individual and official capacity as Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, WARDEN KENNETH BLACK, in his individual and official capacity as Warden of the Richland Correctional Institution and JOHN AND JANE DOE, 1-10; in their individual and official capacity as Mailroom Staff, Clerks, and Supervisors of the Richland Correctional Institution
Aaron Jones, Sr. v. Shelbie Smith
as 24-3285
Petitioner:
AARON L. JONES, SR.
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
USA v. Emmett Conner, Sr.
as 24-3255
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EMMETT CONNER, SR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
