Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jesse Buchanan v. Jonathan Hemingway
as 22-1710
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE T. BUCHANAN
Respondent / Appellee:
JONATHAN R. HEMINGWAY, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Milan
Anthony Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-3065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, M.D., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons. and MARK WILLIAMS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Elkton
Brandon Taylor v. Warden, FCI Manchester
as 20-6023
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MANCHESTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON L. TAYLOR
Daniel Cole v. Warden, FCI Manchester
as 20-5816
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MANCHESTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL COLE
Ernest Keith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 20-5363
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNEST KEITH, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ASHLAND
William Whitefield v. Warden, Fed Corr Inst
as 20-5210
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM WHITEFIELD
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MANCHESTER
Richard Taylor, Jr. v. Jodie Snyder-Norri
as 15-5770
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LEN TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JODIE L. SNYDER-NORRIS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Ashland, Kentucky
Derrick Armstrong v. Warden, FCI Manchester
as 14-5361
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK A. ARMSTRONG
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MANCHESTER, KENTUCKY
Anthony Belcher v. Juan Castillo
as 11-6504
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY LEE BELCHER
Respondent - Appellee:
JUAN D. CASTILLO, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Memphis, Tennessee
Cullen Harris v. Juan Castillo
as 11-6295
Petitioner - Appellant:
CULLEN REED HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JUAN D. CASTILLO, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
