Cases 1 - 6 of 6
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5469
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5462
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
Calvin Warsaw v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-2554
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN D. WARSAW
Respondent - Appellee:
CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
USA, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 15-6280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., JAMES DOGHRAMJI, SHEREE COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hospital, DYERSBURG HOSPITAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Dyersburg Regional Medical Center and others
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA,, et al v. Globus Medical, Inc.
as 09-6144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC., MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS COMPANY and others
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
Movant - Appellant:
ANDREW R. CARR, Esq. and BOBBIE VADEN
Lee Morof, et al v. United Missouri Bank, Warsaw
as 09-1711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE MOROF and TERI MOROF, aka Teri Cohodes
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED MISSOURI BANK, WARSAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
