Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marqueth Wilson v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 19-3050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUETH WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-6385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
Hobart Corporation, et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 13-3362
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
HOBART CORPORATION, KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant:
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC., GLAXSOSMITHKLINE, LLC and THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
DAP PRODUCTS, INC.
Hobart Corporation, et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 13-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOBART CORPORATION, KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC., DAP PRODUCTS, INC., GLAXSOSMITHKLINE, LLC and others
Tennessee Coal Company, et al v. Sandra White, et al
as 12-3269
Petitioner:
TENNESSEE COAL COMPANY and THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
Respondent:
SANDRA K. WHITE, Widow of and Obo Norman E. White and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
