Cases 1 - 10 of 3,257
Briggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Laronda June Briggs
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wofford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Sonya Renee Wofford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Maurice Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Yvonnie L. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Kain v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Kayla D. Kain
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Littlebear v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Jason Littlebear
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Potts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Potts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Alberto Douglas Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Tate v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Adam R. Tate
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fundak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Darnald T. Fundak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
