Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Gurevitch v. KeyCorp et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Menachem Gurevitch, Richard Thompson and Thomas Marcotte
Defendant:
KeyCorp, Christopher M. Gorman, Beth E. Mooney and others
Petitioner:
Robert J. Titmas
Robertson v. Janoski-Haehlen et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Clark A. Robertson
Defendant:
Emily Janoski-Haehlen, Christopher J. Peters, Charles Oldfield and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Clark County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45410
Plaintiff:
Clark County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clarke County, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45247
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and Cardinal Health Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clarke County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark County Fiscal Court v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45172
Plaintiff:
Clark County Fiscal Court
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.