Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Larkins et al v. Fifth Third Mortgage Company
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Fifth Third Mortgage Company
Plaintiff:
Anne K. Larkins and Robert J. Larkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Peggy A. Davis v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peggy A Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Davis v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
U.S. Bank National Association v. Merusi et al
as 1:2018cv00485
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
John Doe, The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc., M. Elizabeth Merusi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boston v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 2:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Boston
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage , Franklin County Sheriff and Bethany L. Suttinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Trask et al v. Greenville Federal Financial Corporation
as 3:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peggy Trask and Mark Trask
Defendant:
Greenville Federal Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Grant v. Franklin Credit Management Corporation, et al.
as 2:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nicole D. Grant
Defendant:
Franklin Credit Management Corporation and Bosco Credit II Trust Series 2010-1
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Marais v. Reimer Law Co. et al
as 2:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
Christine Marais
Defendant:
Reimer Law Co. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lohman et al v. Beneficial Financial I, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lohman and Robert Lohman
Defendant:
Beneficial Financial I, Inc. and Household Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Buckner v. Chase Bank, JP Morgan
as 1:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Lorin Kal Buckner
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.