Cases 91 - 100 of 6,945
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Zieg v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Michael B Zieg
Defendant:
Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chams v. Sibcy Cline, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
James Chams
Defendant:
Sibcy Cline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Gebraub et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Woini Gebraub and WG Permit Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Misner v. Empire Auto Protect, LLC
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Brady Misner
Defendant:
Empire Auto Protect, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baker v. Line Financial, PBC
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Paula Baker
Defendant:
Line Financial, PBC doing business as Beem
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Forsburg v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Gerald Forsburg, Jenna Doctor, Luis Castro and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
