Cases 11 - 20 of 81,624
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Flyland Designs, Inc. v. Ace Trading Group, Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Flyland Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Ace Trading Group, Ltd. and VCABS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Jerieme v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Murrell Jerieme
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hardwick v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Hardwick
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP, INC. fka E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Turner v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Renea Turner
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khelif v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Jacalyn Khelif
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burdette v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
David Burdette
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walke et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03117
Plaintiff:
Mary Walke and Alan Walke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elliott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
Loretta Elliott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
