Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,019
Shimp v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03184
Plaintiff: June Shimp
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lugert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03186
Plaintiff: Gerald Lugert
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dicarlo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03185
Plaintiff: Deborah Dicarlo
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03182
Plaintiff: John Lawson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03183
Plaintiff: Gregory Brown
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Newsom v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff: Darren Newsom
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03188
Plaintiff: Raymond L. Davis
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03189
Plaintiff: John D. Phillips
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palumbo et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03192
Plaintiff: Michael Palumbo and Cissy Claar
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03193
Plaintiff: Christopher Joseph
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?