Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Sosa v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Toni K. Sosa
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jill Victoria Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Melissa D. Collins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dano et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Autumn Dano , Larry Dano , Kathy Dunlap and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerley et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kerley and K. Lynn Kerley
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dana Bates , Charles Bates , Sandra Foster and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauernfeind et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00608
Plaintiff:
Monica Bauernfeind and James Bauernfeind
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sue Bilbrey Copeland
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
