Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Febus v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00727
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Febus
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sosa v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Toni K. Sosa
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jill Victoria Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dana Bates , Charles Bates , Sandra Foster and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore, et.al. v. Davol, Inc., et.al.
as 3:2011cv00487
Plaintiff:
Charles Frederick Moore and Cynthia Gale Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
Barry M. Smith, Barry M. Smith, Sherry Smith and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
French et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
Hugh French, Hugh French, Hugh French and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
