Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 548,493
Fansler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03244
Plaintiff: Curtis Fansler
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Castillo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03245
Plaintiff: Ronald Castillo
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03241
Plaintiff: Karleen D Hart
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rawers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03242
Plaintiff: Michael A Rawers
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03247
Plaintiff: Richard A. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03235
Plaintiff: Raymond Noel
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavigliano et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03239
Plaintiff: Joseph Cavigliano and Estate of Theresa Cavigliano
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwartoski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03248
Plaintiff: James C Edwartoski
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sicher v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03249
Plaintiff: Dale Sicher
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Godfrey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03250
Plaintiff: Zachry T Godfrey
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?