Franchise Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 171 - 180 of 195
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Superior Beverage Group Ltd. et al
as 2:2007cv00114
Plaintiff: Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and others
Defendant: Hill Distributing Company, Hill Distributing Company and Esber Beverage Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Knall Beverage, Inc. v. InBev USA, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00064
Plaintiff: Knall Beverage, Inc., Knall Beverage, Inc., Knall Beverage, Inc. and others
Defendant: InBev International, InBev International, InBev International and others
Intervenor Defendant: Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Knall Beverage, Inc., Knall Beverage, Inc. and Knall Beverage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
R.L. Lipton Distributing Company et al v. InBev USA LLC et al
as 2:2006cv01069
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
EG Systems, Inc. v. Landgrebe
as 2:2006cv01032
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Szekely v. General Motors Corporation
as 1:2006cv02817
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wine Distributors, Inc. v. Brown-Forman Corporation et al
as 1:2006cv01824
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wine Distributors, Inc. v. Pernod Ricard USA et al
as 1:2006cv01790
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. Adams Eyes LLC et al
as 1:2006cv00324
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Restaurant Company v. Trigild International Inc
as 1:2006cv00282
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Falconbridge Limited v. Falcon Foundry Company
as 4:2006cv01125
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?