Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Oliveira v. Myers Well Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05749
Plaintiff:
Fabio Oliveira
Defendant:
Myers Well Service, Inc., Nicholas Potts, JOHN DOE ONE THROUGH TEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keehl v. Animed Research Consulting, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00392
Defendant:
Fairfield Commons Enterprises, LLC No 2 and Animed Research Consulting, LLC jointly and severally doing business as Pet and Exotic Wellness Center
Plaintiff:
Marie Keehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Annapolis, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45710
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Tormarco Harris, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2019cv01290
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Store #1330
Plaintiff:
Joyce Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENSMINGER v. WELLS et al
as 1:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
KAREN ENSMINGER
Defendant:
LISA M WELLS and LAW OFFICES OF LISA WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Well v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Francis Russell Well
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Leighann Wells
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01305
Plaintiff:
Michael Grandville Wells
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01293
Plaintiff:
Bonnie May Wells
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Well v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00832
Plaintiff:
Amber Lee Well
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
