Cases 151 - 160 of 462
District Attorney of Clearfield County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45022
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
District Attorney Of Clearfield County
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Health Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45025
Defendant:
purdue pharma l.p, Walgreen Co, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Health Fund
Laborers' District Council Building and Construction Health and Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45019
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., purdue pharma l.p and others
Plaintiff:
Laborers' District Council Building and Construction Health and Welfare Fund
Smith v. Indivior Inc. et al
as 1:2021op45020
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Hikma Labs Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Eric Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asbestos Workers Local Union No. 2 Welfare Fund v. Allergan, PLC
as 1:2021op45023
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc., McKesson Corporation, Walgreen Co and others
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Local Union No. 2 Welfare Fund
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith and Kandice Cowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00516
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gareisha Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jacklin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepard v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2020op45301
Defendant:
H.D. SMITH HOLDINGS, LLC., MYLAN PHARMACUETICALS, INC., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jerica Shepard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
