Cases 11 - 20 of 29,334
Dowdy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
William R Dowdy, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Villareal v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A Villareal
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Landry v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65693
Plaintiff:
Rachel Landry
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Khelif v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Jacalyn Khelif
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burdette v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
David Burdette
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walke et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03117
Plaintiff:
Mary Walke and Alan Walke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elliott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
Loretta Elliott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Logan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Logan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hatcher v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Ruby L. Hatcher
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
