Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bolton v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
Teresa Maureen Bolton
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schmidt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02346
Plaintiff:
Maureen A. Schmidt
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sherman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
Maureen Sherman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LaBurt v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Maureen LaBurt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schwegel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
Maureen Schwegel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larkin v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2020cv00928
Plaintiff:
Maureen Larkin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray-Schlott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05584
Plaintiff:
Maureen Murray-Schlott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04182
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maureen Horner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berezny et al v. DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. et al
as 1:2019dp20034
Plaintiff:
Edward Berezny and Maureen Berezny
Defendant:
Johnson & Johson Services, Inc., Depuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lumby v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01354
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maureen Lumby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
