Cases 41 - 50 of 238
Neal v. Hallsons of Lebanon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00672
Defendant:
Hallsons of Lebanon, Inc., Hallsons Enterprises Inc., Robert Hall, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Neal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anderson v. LaRosa's, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00651
Plaintiff:
Noah Anderson
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, Doe Corporation 1-10, Michael LaRosa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGrothers v. GT Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04050
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, GT Pizza, Inc., Doe Corporation 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
William McGrothers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Bookout v. Coratola et al
as 2:2020cv03882
Defendant:
ABC Entities 1-3, John/Jane Does 1-3, Peter L. Coratola, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bookout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foltz v. International Contracting LLC et al
as 4:2020cv01680
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTING LLC, ANTHONY BONAMASE, DES MATERIAL & SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS FOLZ, individually, and on behalf of John Doe, Minor
Counter Defendant:
Curtis Foltz
Counter Claimant:
International Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilson v. Grolawn, Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv01559
Defendant:
John Abel and Grolawn, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wilson
Noble v. Mt. Washington Pizzeria, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00489
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, Nicholas Fucito, Doe Corp. 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Six Slice Acquisitions, LLC. et al
as 1:2020cv00432
Plaintiff:
William Bailey
Defendant:
Six Slice Acquisitions, LLC, Brian Drescher, Doe Corporation and others
Babarsky v. Thai on High, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02477
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Babarsky
Defendant:
John Doe and Thai on High, LLC
Lahnanen v. General Aluminum Mfg. Company
as 5:2020cv01066
Plaintiff:
John Lahnanen
Defendant:
General Aluminum Mfg. Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
